With one primary teacher, or sensei, a taiko group can achieve uniformity in kata and style. In this way, I’ve often been impressed by Japanese wadaiko groups and North American taiko groups with a sensei. But for those of us who function without a main teacher or repertoire with a singular approach, the question of kata and style is more complex.
In Soh Daiko, we are blessed with a varied repertoire representing different styles and techniques. We need to recognize this fact and alter our playing style depending on the piece (and the decisions made by the practice committee and song captain). This is easier said than done, and as I implied in an earlier post, taiko players do not readily change their playing style. No doubt this is due to bodily habits that are difficult to change, but when you think about it for just a second, you’ll realize that we really are obligated to adjust our style when playing a varied repertoire. After all, why would you use Sukeroku style when playing Chichibu Yatai Bayashi? Why use Osuwa style when playing Miyake?
Now, people’s habits are locked into their bodies and I don’t expect to unlock everything in two weeks (or two months or even two years). However, I hope to make people aware of their habits and offer them real alternatives. This coming practice, I will ask everyone to perform a basic rhythmic pattern (with the taiko on the ground, drumhead up) using three different techniques: sword, snake, and bell tower. While the actual hitting mechanism is the same or similar in all three techniques, the pull-back and wind-up are drastically different. I am consciously avoiding actual group names, styles, or teachers for two important reasons: (1) I am not officially schooled in these styles and do not claim to teach in these styles, and (2) I don’t want people to be influenced, either positively or negatively, by what they think they know about certain styles. Therefore, I’m using descriptive terms that, I hope, are evocative, easy to remember, and useful. Remember, these are exercises in awareness and bodily change. I am not advocating for any of these approaches per se.
No wrist adjustment as you raise your arm. Slight reach away from the body. Slice down.
Adjust the wrist with a slight rotation as you raise your arm. The arm is fluid and flexible.
No wrist adjustment as you raise your arm. Pull the bachi down.
Update: As predicted, I wasn’t able to get everyone to immediately change their playing style. There are a few people who are completed locked into their bodily habits and either are reluctant to change or unable to change without a full mechanical overhaul. In general, these were the players with little experience (and minimal bodily awareness) or players who trained for an extended period of time or from an early age with a Japanese wadaiko group (and, by repetition, have concretized a single style in their body). I wish I could overhaul these players, but our dojo time is too precious and I need to continue with our itinerary. I pointed out some of these “locked habits” to the other practice leaders and hopefully they’ll work on them in the coming year.
I introduced each of the three general styles (sword, snake, bell tower), and we tried out a simple rhythmic pattern using each style. Then we started switching from style to style. Afterwards, we played a different pattern from our repertoire and I asked two members to sit out, watch, and diagnose each player as exhibiting the sword, snake, or bell tower style. After the pattern was done, I asked each individual member to self-diagnose and then we heard the diagnosis from the two outside members. Some surprise and some confirmation.
I’m not sure if this exercise will have lasting value, but it seems to have done at least three things: (1) we’re becoming aware of our bodily habits, (2) we now have a vocabulary for describing and diagnosing these habits, and, (3) we realized that our left and right arms are often noticeably different. One member was described as a snake with her right arm and a sword in her left. Another was described as a bell tower with a small snake at the apex (slight cocking of the wrist). Others were just swords or bell towers. Actually, the whole exercise was kind of fun and, after a little review, might lead to better awareness and taiko execution. We’ll see. Next week, we’ll apply these “styles” to the slant stand (snake, bell tower) and odaiko (sword, bell tower).
One final update: My month as practice leader is over now. I haven’t spoken with many members of Soh Daiko about the efficacy of the drills (sword, snake, bell tower), but I hope to get some feedback soon. During October, we had to prepare for one group performance and two small-group performances, and I handed over one practice to a practice leader in training. All in all, I’m sure the drills would have been more effective had I had more time. But I guess that’s the perennial complaint.
Pros: I think some people became aware of their playing tendencies and now we have a vocabulary to describe the different nuances of technique. Perhaps some individuals will consciously attempt to change. I’ve already noticed some practice leaders picking up on the vocabulary in order to attain more uniformity.
Cons: I don’t think we spent enough time drilling and reviewing the different techniques. For some individuals, these drills will soon be forgotten and they will resume their previous playing style. That’s not necessarily a tragedy, although I had hoped to increase our individual and group adaptability.
Conclusion (for me): More than likely, I will only attempt one single style with the Colby student group. If they are beginners, it will be most beneficial for them to learn one style well, rather than introduce various styles. With the bell-tower technique, they’ll have a strong foundation for hitting efficiently, using speed, and relaxing.